These
pages, marked with GREEN headings, are published for comment
and criticism. These are not our final findings; some of
these opinions will probably change. LOG
OF UPDATES
Overview of
all studies: Because of the largely unexpected transformational
power of molecular manufacturing, it is urgent to understand the issues
raised. To date, there has not been anything approaching an adequate study
of these issues. CRN's recommended series of thirty
essential studies is organized into five sections, covering fundamental
theory, possible technological capabilities, bootstrapping potential,
product capabilities, and policy questions. Several preliminary conclusions
are stated, and because our understanding points to a crisis, a parallel
process of conducting the studies is urged.
CRN is actively
looking for researchers interested in performing or assisting with this
work. Please contact CRN Research Director Chris
Phoenix if you would like more information or if you have comments
on the proposed studies.
Study
#16
How
rapidly could products be designed?
What skills and time
are required to design a new product? These questions will be answered
for products of diamondoid systems
based on the Phoenix
nanofactory design.
Subquestion
To what extent
can components be re-used between products?
Preliminary answer
As noted in Nanosystems and
explored in “Nanofactory,” a
convergent-assembly system combining relatively large (e.g. 200-nm) functional
blocks should allow a few basic types of blocks to be built into many
different products. Most product designers will not have to worry about
chemistry or special nanoscale physics.
Subquestion
To what extent
can low-level design be automated?
Preliminary answer
Levels of abstraction
should allow design on the level of volume-filling specification of nanoblocks.
All lower levels can be computed, right down to the mechanosynthesis.
Subquestion
How quickly
and cheaply can product prototypes be built?
Preliminary answer
As quickly and cheaply
as any finished product. The manufacturing steps can be computed from
the CAD specification of the product. There's no distinction between prototype
production and mass production. This also implies immediate rollout/deployment
once a product design is finished—no retooling, retraining, or design-for-manufacture.
Subquestion
How directly
applicable are current engineering methods?
Preliminary answer
Once a set of designs
is developed to emulate familiar macro-scale structural and functional
components, crude products could be developed directly with current engineering
methods (with some advantages such as effectively infinite tolerance and
'smart' materials). More sophisticated products requiring micro- or nano-scale
design may require new methods, though even here the designer's job will
be made easier by careful choice of lower-level components.
Subquestion
What new
engineering methods (e.g. fault tolerance, emergent architecture) need
to be invented to use this technology?
Preliminary answer
Fault tolerance will
be a requirement. However, the extreme compactness and efficiency of actuation
and computation will allow massive overdesign and redundancy. For example,
a single computer may fail, but the incremental cost of three—or
even 100—parallel voting computers will be negligible in most applications.
Emergent architecture
and complicated software architectures will not be necessary for products
comparable to today's in functionality.
Mass-saving structures
will be desirable, especially in aerospace applications. Fractal trusses
and inflatable compression members are two simple possibilities.
Conclusion
Design
of products comparable to today's cutting edge may be even easier than
today's design methods.
The situation is
extremely urgent. The stakes are unprecedented, and the world is unprepared.
The basic findings of these studies should be verified as rapidly as possible
(months, not years). Policy preparation and planning for implementation,
likely including a crash development program, should begin immediately.
(Sorry, no one has complained about this page yet, and we
couldn't think of anything to write. Please contact
us with your questions, criticisms, and other
suggestions.)