These
pages, marked with GREEN headings, are published for comment
and criticism. These are not our final findings; some of
these opinions will probably change. LOG
OF UPDATES
Overview of
all studies: Because of the largely unexpected transformational
power of molecular manufacturing, it is urgent to understand the issues
raised. To date, there has not been anything approaching an adequate study
of these issues. CRN's recommended series of thirty
essential studies is organized into five sections, covering fundamental
theory, possible technological capabilities, bootstrapping potential,
product capabilities, and policy questions. Several preliminary conclusions
are stated, and because our understanding points to a crisis, a parallel
process of conducting the studies is urged.
CRN is actively
looking for researchers interested in performing or assisting with this
work. Please contact CRN Research Director Chris
Phoenix if you would like more information or if you have comments
on the proposed studies.
Study
#6
What
other chemistries and options should be studied?
This is a grab bag
of questions intended to suggest possibilities that may have been overlooked.
Subquestion
What other
chemistries may be suitable for atomically precise programmable assembly?
Preliminary answer
Merkle has suggested
small cubical molecules with boron and nitrogen. Phoenix and Toth-Fejel suggested
POSS (polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane) as an early building
block. Silica is interesting, especially since its deposition can be
catalyzed by proteins such as R5. Perhaps precise metal nanoparticles
could be fused. Other possibilities no doubt will be offered.
Subquestion
What is the
potential of top-down technologies using imprecise chemistry, in terms
of self-manufacture and device performance? (e.g. extrusion, DPN, metal-over-buckytube,
MEMS, inkjet, stereolithography, masked or hologram-switched optical surface
activation)
Preliminary answer
Some of these appear
to have fairly high throughput. Many are flexible in the materials they
can deposit. More work will be needed to determine what kinds of devices,
especially bearing surfaces, can be made with these imprecise technologies.
Subquestion
What about
atom holograms and atom lasers?
Preliminary answer
Unknown. Atom holograms,
a way of programmably redirecting a beam of atoms into complex deposition
patterns, were demonstrated
in Japan several years ago, and have not made a lot of news since.
Atom laser is a confusingly similar name for a very different technology:
a way to reduce a cloud of atoms to a single quantum state, making them
extremely controllable. The technologies may be synergistic.
Subquestion
Are there
synergies between any of the considered technologies, making problems
easier to solve or improving performance of a technology?
Preliminary answer
Almost certainly.
Conclusion
Molecular
manufacturing may be easier than we realize. Many possibly helpful technologies
have not yet been assessed. There's no way to know without studying multiple
alternatives.
The situation is
extremely urgent. The stakes are unprecedented, and the world is unprepared.
The basic findings of these studies should be verified as rapidly as possible
(months, not years). Policy preparation and planning for implementation,
likely including a crash development program, should begin immediately.
(Sorry, no one has complained about this page yet, and we
couldn't think of anything to write. Please contact
us with your questions, criticisms, and other
suggestions.)